I don't want to sound callous, but I don't think there's any way to bring this up without sounding callous, so:
The deaths in London are a tragedy, make no mistake. But the weekly death toll in Iraq from terrorist bombings is more or less equivalent. The disparity between our reactions to the two surprises and confuses me. The Iraqis who die have stories, too.
The deaths in London are a tragedy, make no mistake. But the weekly death toll in Iraq from terrorist bombings is more or less equivalent. The disparity between our reactions to the two surprises and confuses me. The Iraqis who die have stories, too.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-08 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-08 10:14 pm (UTC)Even aside from the newness, the relative rate does make a difference, especially against Iraq's extremely violent past under Hussein. If you graph out violent deaths per week in Iraq, I bet the current rate is low historically speaking, whereas yesterday's spike in London is a pretty significant spike.
And, it may also be plain and simple racism or nationalism for a lot of people. We react more strongly to people who look, walk, and talk more like us than to people with an alien culture, religion, language, and appearance.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-09 12:24 am (UTC)This got a huge amount of attention because it happened in a place 'everyone thought was safe'. (Quotes because that's a simplification in so many ways....)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-09 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-10 01:47 am (UTC)I don't want to sound callous either, but I was initially surprised at how shocked everyone was at what sounded like a low death toll. But then a) a friend reminded me of the large number of casualties in total and b) I keep being sobered by the remembrance that I've *been* through at least 3 of those tube stations...and if it'd been a week later, I very well might've been in King's Cross making my way through London after flying back from Spain. It's partly the shock to me that something happened in England, a place however simplistically I would've thought was relatively safe, combined with those personal ties.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-10 03:46 am (UTC)Think about how much attention was paid to the death of *one person* (or, depending on how you count, two people) with the Scott and Laci Peterson thing, or with the deaths of three people with the Brian Nichols thing, or any other big story about some high-profile murder or whatnot. If the media counted these things on the basis of total number of deaths, the Columbine shootings would easily have been pushed aside by any number of inner-city gang-violence stories from the same year. And so on.